|
Dear Friend,
I have some very exciting news to share!
My long-time readers will recall that, in 2019, I started working on a paper to refute the Hviid et al. MMR-autism study out of Denmark that the media absurdly hailed as proving conclusively, once and for all, that "vaccines do not cause autism"—even among "genetically susceptible" children.
Then the COVID-19 lockdown madness hit with its coerced mass vaccination endgame, and I put that massive project on the back burner to put 100% of my efforts into exposing the lies being used to manufacture consent for that regime of medical tyranny.
Then last year I got in touch with Dr. Brian Hooker, the chief scientific officer of Children's Health Defense (CHD), whom you might also know as the person who broke the story of CDC whistleblower William Thompson—as featured in the film Vaxxed.
After I shared the draft of my Hviid et al. rebuttal with him, he expressed interest in collaborating with me to complete it and get it published. So, it came off the back burner!
Dr. Hooker also connected me with CHD fellow in science and research Dr. Jeet Varia, who reformatted, restructured, and revised my draft—which I'd written with the intent to publish it on my own website—to prepare it for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Well, I am pleased to announce that our paper has now been published!
It is titled "Hviid et al. 2019 Vaccine-Autism Study: Much Ado About Nothing?", published in the Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedicine on May 7.
👉Download the full paper here!
I am currently working on an article that will summarize our paper in plain layperson language—a job I am uniquely suited for as a layperson myself!
So, please stay tuned for that forthcoming article.
In the meantime, you can read our paper for yourself at the above link, and here is what my friend Dr. James Lyons-Weiler just had to say about it:
"The Hammond et al. review, published in the Journal of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, does not simply critique the statistical conclusions of the Hviid paper—it dissects the very structure of its logic, methodology, and assumptions. Their verdict is unequivocal: the Hviid study could not have disproven a vaccine-autism link because it was never designed to find one. If anything, it was designed to avoid one."
My long-time readers will also recognize Dr. Lyons-Weiler as the coauthor and data analyst for the key study I focused on in my book The War on Informed Consent, which study examined Dr. Paul Thomas's patient data and showed unequivocally that his completely unvaccinated patients were far healthier than the general population of highly vaccinated children. |
